Month: April 2020

Forgiveness is not a cosmic do over

God as Judge is one of the basic tenants of a biblical view of God.  To judge means to consider, render an opinion, and announce the verdict.  We normally think of judgments in a punitive context, but the concept is much broader.  For example, in athletic events there are judges who hand out trophies (rewards) for accomplishments.  Scripture teaches that God is our Judge who has the authority and power to judge mankind for good or evil. 

Although not very visible in current Christian culture, the subject of judgment is a consistent theme from Genesis to Revelation.  It is a critical part of the gospel and a biblical worldview.

Much of the story line of the Bible is about God judging man’s performance and issuing a verdict whether positive or negative.  This fact does not contradict any of the other characteristics of God.  For example, there is no judgment of God that is not loving as well as just. 

The first Doctrine to be denied, according to the Bible, is the doctrine of judgment. In many disputes about God and religion, this pattern often repeats itself, because if you can get rid of that one teaching, then rebellion has no adverse consequences, and so you are free to do anything.(DA Carson, The God Who is There, p32)

The theme of judgment can be categorized as past, present, and future.  I have listed several important judgments under each as a way to highlight a very complex subject.  We need to consider them especially in light of the atonement, forgiveness, and reconciliation.

Past Judgment (Eden –Gen. 3:14-18)

1.  Physical and spiritual death (Gen. 2:17)

2.  Conflict socially and with nature (Gen. 16-19)

Present Judgment

3.  Moral decay and degeneration (Rom 1:18-22)

4.  God’s fatherly discipline (Heb. 12:4-11)

Future Judgment

5.  Final Judgment for those without Christ (Great White Throne)

6.  Stewardship judgment for those in Christ (2 Cor. 5:10; cf. Rom. 14:10-12; 1 Cor. 3:9-14; 9:24-27)

Reconciliation through the cross has a major impact on understanding the above spectrum of judgments.  Specifically, reconciliation overcomes spiritual death but, it does not eliminate all the consequences of sin. The conflict between people and with nature remains with us as God’s judgment from the past and it will remain until we begin life in the new heaven and earth.  Forgiveness and reconciliation do not remove us from the struggle and pain of this judgment/curse because of man’s fall.

In the present, moral decay is evident in our broken world.  We are impacted by it whether we are complicit in it or not.  Paul teaches in Romans 1 that when people continually reject God and His revelation through nature, He eventually removes His hand of protection and “gives them over” to the natural consequences of immorality.  People and cultures that continually deny God and His authority and sovereignty over all that He has created, will drift further and further into immorality and its consequences … dragging all of society with it.

As His children our loving heavenly Father will also judge, correct, discipline and chastise us.   It is part of our birthright (Heb. 12:5-6).  The New Testament gives us several examples of the judgment/discipline of the Lord:

                         1.  The seven churches in Revelations Rev. 2-3

                         2.  Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5

                         3.  Misusing the Lord’s Supper in 1 Cor. 11:29

Although God’s discipline of His children today may not always be as dramatic as these examples, we should not become complacent and think He will not discipline us. Rather we should be grateful He does because, although painful at the time, it “produces a harvest of righteousness and peace…” (Heb. 12:11). 

The future, final judgment of condemnation has been eliminated for those in God’s family of faith, but there will still be the judgment of accountability (Behma) … not from the standpoint of sin but of stewardship.   Although the picture of how this will impact our future remains cloudy, there is no doubt of the continuity between this life and the next.  Being reconciled, dying physically, or experiencing the return of Christ will not provide a “do-over” for believers.  There will be no cosmic eraser that eliminates our history and level of responsibility.  Paul states it this way:

“Each man’s work will become evident; for the day will show it, because it is to be revealed with fire; and the fire itself will test the quality of each man’s work. If any man’s work which he has built upon it remains, he shall receive a reward. If any man’s work is burned up, he shall suffer loss; but he himself shall be saved, yet so as through fire” (1 Cor. 3:13-15).

Paul, in his anticipation of being home with the Lord also wrote:

“Therefore we also have as our ambition, whether at home or absent, to be pleasing to Him.  For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may be recompensed for his deeds in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad” (2 Cor. 5:9-10). 

In conclusion, being forgiven and reconciled to God has not eliminated all forms of God’s judgment.  This fact should motivate us to avoid a casual or cavalier attitude regarding our relationship with Christ.  In the book of Hebrews we are reminded to come boldly into His presence, but that does not mean carelessly.

Here are several observations to consider as we live out our reconciled relationship with God:

• We are all under the judgment of God (Acts 24:15-16) and that is sobering (Heb. 10:31-32).
• His judgments are loving as well as just.
• His punitive, correcting, or rewarding judgments (verdicts) can be immediate or deferred.
• The atonement eliminates condemnation but not accountability (Rom 8:1; 2 Cor. 5:10).
• Forgiveness is a “start over” not a “do over”: not a “delete” key on our computer (Gal 6:7-8).
• God’s judgments provide a proper motivation for discipleship: holy living and stewardship (2Cor 5:10; Acts 24:15-16).

Question for reflection:

Why do you think the teaching about the judgments of God have become marginalized in our current church culture?

God’s forgiveness is often referred to as a pardon.  But is it?  The word pardon is never used in the New Testament in connection with the atonement.  So why do we use the terms interchangeably?  Forgiveness is intrinsically linked to reconciliation in the Bible.  No one is forgiven who is not also reconciled to God.  I would suggest that the concept of a legal pardon, while providing some helpful illustrative parallels, is inadequate to explain what is offered to us through God’s forgiveness.

Our current constitutional model of a pardon comes from our English heritage.  Modeled after English monarchs, the power to pardon was built into our constitution and given to presidents – not the judicial system. 

Although the constitution does not describe a pardon, it is generally accepted that a legal pardon can be given for any reason and it can be granted at any time in the legal process.  A pardon can be given before conviction (President Ford pardoned Nixon), while serving a prison sentence, or after the sentence has been completed.  A pardon does not wipe the conviction off the record, but it does release the convicted from future punishment and restores some, not all, of the civil rights lost due to the conviction.  

As you can see from the above description, there are parallels between an executive pardon and God’s forgiveness, but a pardon falls far short of the magnitude of God’s forgiveness.  A pardon can release us from further judgment, but it cannot infuse new life, impart righteousness, restore fellowship (reconciliation), or give us a new identity.  Forgiveness does all of the above.   It is an act of divine mercy which is undeserved but definitely not free or unconditional.  It is offered at the cost of the substitutionary sacrifice of Christ at Calvary and it is conditionally given on the basis of faith and repentance. 

Here is a brief comparison between a legal pardon and biblical forgiveness:

How they are similar: 

• Both are granted by the sovereign of the country or state.
• Both are an act of mercy.
• Both can be granted for any reason and at any time.
• Both can have conditions attached at the will of the sovereign.
• Both are permanent. 
• Both remove some, but not all, of the consequences of the conviction.
• Both must be accepted to become effective.

How they are dissimilar:

• One is an outright declaration; the other is based on substitutionary atonement.
• One changes our liability; the other also changes our identity.
• One gives us freedom; the other also gives us His righteousness.
• One is an impersonal legal construct; the other is a relational covenant promise.
• One restores our rights; the other restores our relationship.

It is apparent that forgiveness is similar to a pardon but a great deal more.  If people do not understand the difference, salvation becomes a pardon in their minds and they treat it like a “get out of jail free” card.  A person who has been pardoned in the penal system may be grateful for the commuted sentence but still remain detached, distant, and even defiant toward the one who pardoned him.  

Biblical forgiveness involves reconciliation based on substitution and exchange.  Those who hold to a retributive view of justice argue that pardons are unjust since justice is not served.  With God’s forgiveness justice is served on the cross and grace is offered in the gospel message.  As Judge He convicts, as King He pardons, and as Savior He takes our penalty and exchanges our sin for His righteousness so that we can be reconciled into an eternal, intimate relationship with God. 

Therefore, when we are forgiven (not just pardoned) through the work of Jesus Christ, we are reconciled to God and begin a whole new relationship with Him.  Growing in that relationship is what discipleship is all about.  It is the purpose of discipleship.  Understanding the difference between pardon and forgiveness turns discipleship from an option to a priority and from a duty to a delight.    

Question for reflection

How should the difference between a pardon and forgiveness affect how we deal with those who have offended us?

^1.  L. Gregory Jones, Embodying Forgiveness:  A Theological Analysis (Grand Rapids, MI:  Eerdmans, 1995),5.